Ferc opinion 511

Author: mqog

August undefined, 2024

WebAug 29, 2024 · Start Preamble August 23, 2024. AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice of information collections and request for comments. SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) is soliciting public … WebInterstate Pipeline Co. v. FERC, 165 F.3d 54, 57 (D.C. Cir. 1999). Under the discounted cash flow model, FERC “examin[es] the percentage returns on equity the market requires for members of a proxy group.” Opinion 511, 134 FERC ¶ 61,121, at ¶ 242. “The members of the proxy group must fall with[in] a reasonable range of comparable risks and

Continental Airlines, Inc., et al. v. FERC and United States …

WebThe current awareness component of the FERC Opinions, Orders, & Decisions service. The report letters provides highlights of FERC administrative decisions. References in the report letter link directly to the full-text source material reproduced in the Reporter. Includes archival issues back to 2007. WebMorgan Energy Partners, L.P (KMEP) (prior parent of SFPP) in Opinion No. 511 that caused it to depart from its typical exclusion of short-term debt from capital structure, 5Inquiry Regarding the Commission’s Policy for Determining Return on Equity, 171 FERC ¶ 61,155 (2024) (ROE Policy Statement). drapery\u0027s 3h

Resetting FERC ROE Policy - Brattle Group

Web8 Opinion No. 511, 134 FERC ¶ 61,121 at P 320. 20150219-3011 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 02/19/2015. Docket No. IS08-390-004, et al. - 4 - “rate design” at the May 1, 1996 level.9 Opinion No. 511-A selected May 1, 1996 because this was the date that the rates in SFPP’s most recent fully litigated West Line ... WebAug 4, 2024 · The panel granted petitions for review, and vacated orders issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) in which FERC held that the California Water Resources Control Board (the “State Board”) had waived its authority to ensure that certain hydroelectric projects complied with state water quality standards. WebWe would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. drapery\u0027s 3f

FERC Rates and Tariffs LandMark Publications

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Decision Puts FERC

WebSFPP, L.P., Opinion 511-A, 137 FERC ¶ 61,220 (2011) (Opinion 511-A), R. 1014, JA 724; and 3. SFPP, L.P., Opinion 511-B, 150 FERC ¶ 61,096 (2015) (Opinion 511-B), R. 1044, JA 964 (collectively, West Line Orders). C. Related Cases This case, which concerns Respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) approval of rates for ... http://www.regllc.com/industry/commission_orders/additional_ferc_orders/SFPP%20-%20Opinion%20511-B,%20150FERC61,096%20(2015).pdf drapery\u0027s 3nWebResponse to shipper petition for court (panel) rehearing of 7/31/20 decision affirming FERC on all issues, concerning: reasonableness of increased rates for shipment on SFPP’s West Line; various cost of service rate issues, including recovery of income tax allowance. drapery\u0027s 3o

"WebJul 1, 2016 · The court concluded that FERC's choice of data for assessing SFPP's real return on equity was arbitrary or capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 706 (2) (A), because the Commission provided no reasoned basis to justify its decision to rely on the September 2008 data. " - Ferc opinion 511

Ferc opinion 511

Web156 FERC ¶ 61,234 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Norman C. Bay, Chairman; Cheryl A. LaFleur, and Tony Clark. Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers Indiana Industrial Energy … WebDec 4, 2007 · F.E.R.C, 511 F.3d 161 Casetext Search + Citator Opinion Case details Case Details Full title: ENERGIE GROUP, LLC and Elaine Hitchcock, Petitioners v. FEDERAL ENERGY… Court: United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit Date published: Dec 21, 2007 Citations 511 F.3d 161 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Citing Cases …

Did you know?

WebUnited Airlines, et al. v. FERC and USofA No. 11-1479, et al. Opinion, after hearing and ALJ initial decision, addressing reasonableness of increased rates for shipment on SFPP’s West Line; various cost of service rate issues. SFPP, L.P., Opinion 511, 134 FERC ¶ 61,121 (2011), order on reh’g and compl., Opinion 511-A, 137 FERC ¶ 61,220 (2011), … WebOPINION NO. 511-C . ORDER ON REMAND AND COMPLIANCE FILING (Issued March 15, 2024) 1. This order addresses the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s (D.C. Circuit) remand in . United Airlines1 which vacated in part and remanded Commission Opinion Nos. 511, 511-A and 511-B addressing SFPP, L.P.’s

WebFEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION OPINION NO. 511 SFPP, L.P. Docket No. IS08-390-002 OPINION AND ORDER ON INITIAL DECISION (Issued February 17, 2011) 20110217-3071 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 02/17/2011 ... OPINION NO. 511 ORDER ON INITIAL DECISION (Issued February 17, 2011) 1. This order reviews the December 2, … WebThe Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Com-mission) has authority to issue licenses for the construc- ... 511 U.S. 700, -714 713 (1994) (quoting 33 U.S.C. 1341(d)); see at 705 (ex- ... opinion that FERC’s approach to the issue is correct, such that a find-ing of waiver under § 401 is appropriate if the applicant and state agency, in order ...

WebDec 12, 2006 · FERC reasoned that: [J]ust as a corporation has an actual or potential income tax liability on income from the public utility assets it controls, so do the owners of a partnership or limited liability corporation (LLC) on the assets and income that they control by means of the pass-through entity. Id. WebNov 4, 2024 · In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) is soliciting public comment on a renewal of currently approved information collection, FERC-523 (Application for Authorization for the Issuance of Securities or the Assumption of Liabilities). DATES:

WebJul 16, 2024 · Contact: Regina Davis, 202-898-9382, [email protected]. NARUC Petitions Court to Review FERC Order 841. WASHINGTON (July 16, 2024) — On behalf of state utility commissions, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners has filed a petition for review in the Unites States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia …

WebJul 1, 2016 · FERC argues that, because SFPP's cost-of-service rates for 2008 already partially “accounted for the changes in costs associated with the index increase,” Opinion 511-A, 137 FERC ¶ 61,220, at ¶ 407, SFPP can only apply that portion of the 2009 index “not reflected in the cost of service adopted by Opinion No. 511 or the rates SFPP must ... empire meadowlands hotel in secaucusWebAug 10, 2024 · On August 9, 2024, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion, MISO Transmission Owners v.FERC, finding that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s use of a “Risk Premium” model as one of the three models to determine a just and reasonable return on equity (ROE) for wholesale electric transmission rates was … empire measuring toolshttp://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx empire meals merrickWebDec 17, 2024 · On November 19, 2024, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) issued Opinion No. 569-B, its latest order addressing evaluations of whether a public utility’s return on equity... drapery\u0027s 3xWebOpinion No. 511-A, 137 FERC ¶ 61,220 (2011), order on reh’g, Opinion No. 511- B, 150 FERC ¶ 61,096 (2015). 5 At the time of SFPP’s 2008 West Line rate case, SFPP was a wholly owned subsidiary of an MLP. Opinion No. 511-C, 162 FERC ¶ … drapery\u0027s 4WebThis rule broadly extends the conclusions previously reached by FERC in Opinion 511-C, [1] in which the Commission considered whether changes to U.S. tax law required SFPP, L.P. to revise its FERC-jurisdictional, cost-based, pipeline rates in light of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ prior ruling in United Airlines.[2] drapery\u0027s 3rhttp://www.regllc.com/industry/commission_orders/additional_ferc_orders/511D.pdf empire meat company v patrick 1939